Mobile Apps Could Soon Get Regulatory Oversight

Emergo says mobile medical apps should soon see some guidance.

"Manufacturers have thus far received little official guidance from FDA regarding how  CDRH would handle mobile medical applications. Although some medical devices incorporating mobile applications have already been cleared by the FDA—GE’s Pocket Viewer, Airstrip Technologies’ Airstrip, Mobisante’s MobiUs and MIM Software’s Mobile MIM, for example—no high-level evaluation criteria have yet been issued by the regulator regarding these products."

FDA has not determined whether PMA or 510(k) pathways are appropriate.However, Brian Dolan at mobihealthnews says FDA has already been regulating apps, and he has 10 product examples to prove it. Below are a few of the apps Dolan identified as having met FDA scrutiny.

AirStrip OB

AirStrip RPM

GE Healthcare Pocket Viewer

MIM Mobile

 

VEO Multigas Monitor

Vocel Pill Phone

—Heather Thompson

When, not if

It could be argued that mobile apps are already regulated. Numerous apps have been cleared and FDA has pursued enforcement with at least one manufacturer.

What's really missing is a guidance document that spells out (especially for those who would like to avoid being regulated) the basics. My guidance wish list includes the definition of a medical device (with examples), an explanation of device classifications (again with examples), and a schedule for manufacturers to come into compliance.

A standalone app on a smart phone is pretty straight forward. The tricky bits in all this have to do with the interoperability characteristics of many of these mobile app based systems - the typical system includes one or more sensors, a data aggregator/analysis/gateway device (often a smart phone), and a backend application hosted on the Internet.

The current regulatory approach strongly favors proprietary end to end solutions. This flies in the face of a strong market preference for open system interoperability (or alternatively plug and play connectivity).

As a parallel, the FDA initially regulated PACS as an accessory to the imaging modality. Their approach has evolved over time to regulate PACS components individually as plug and play compatible components of a larger system. How quickly the FDA makes this evolution of thought in mHealth or mobile apps will have a significant impact on that nascent industry.